American College of Radiology
Exams & Assessments
Quality & Safety
Centers of Excellence
Lung Cancer Screening
Radiology Data Registries
Advocacy in Action eNews
State & Local Relations
Radiology Advocacy Network
Economics & Health Policy
Awards & Honors
Commissions & Committees
Resident & Fellow
Health Policy Institute
News & Publications
Tools You Can Use
ACR Live Meetings
Meeting & Course Calendar
Where ACR Exhibits
20131030 SGR Replacement Policy Draft
ACR Strategic Plan and Core Purpose
ACR Social Media
Jobs at ACR
SGR Replacement Policy Draft Endorses Use of Appropriateness Criteria in Medical Imaging Exam Ordering
October 30, 2013
The American College of Radiology (ACR) applauds a joint Senate Finance and House Ways And Means Committees’ proposal to require ordering physicians to consult appropriateness criteria for advanced imaging services provided to Medicare patients. The provision, included in a draft policy to replace the sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula, would deny Medicare payment for the exam if appropriateness criteria were not consulted by the ordering provider, and require prior authorization for outlier providers whose ordering is inconsistent with that of their peers.
“This landmark step by Congress is a validation of a cornerstone of the College’s
Imaging 3.0 initiative
that increases quality of imaging care and preserves health care resources. We strongly urge Congress to follow this approach which helps medicine transition from volume-based to quality-based care without interfering in the doctor-patient relationship,” said Paul H. Ellenbogen, M.D., FACR, chair of the American College of Radiology Board of Chancellors.
The policy draft would require the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to specify appropriateness criteria from among those developed/endorsed by national professional medical specialty societies (such as the ACR) or other entities. The secretary must also identify mechanisms, such as clinical decision support (CDS) tools, by which ordering professionals could consult these appropriate use criteria. CDS systems
, and at
Massachusetts General Hospital
, have been shown to cut down on duplicate and/or unnecessary scanning and their associated costs.
“We look forward to continuing our work with Congress, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and other stakeholders to arrive at medical imaging policies that make sense in terms of quality, access and appropriateness. The provisions in this congressional policy draft are a strong first step in that process,” said Ellenbogen.
Studies show that imaging exams reduce
unnecessary hospital admissions
shorten length of stay
, and are directly
linked to greater life expectancy
. A recent
Neiman Institute Report
study in Journal of the American College of Radiology
Moran Company report
show Medicare imaging use and imaging costs are down significantly. Medicare spending on scans today is the same as it was in 2003. And the
Health Care Cost Institute
reports that imaging is the slowest growing of all physician services among the privately insured. Use of appropriateness criteria can help streamline the ordering of these services.
“Use of appropriateness criteria in the ordering of exams can educate providers regarding which scan is best for the patient’s given condition and even when no exam is warranted at all. This can help ensure that every patient who needs imaging care gets the right exam, at the right time, for the right indication, and avoids care that they may not need. This is what modern imaging care is all about. We look forward to working with Congress to help move this process forward,” said Ellenbogen.
In addition to the provisions associated with appropriateness criteria, there are many provisions in the policy draft related to an SGR replacement. The College will review those additional provisions in the days to come and provide feedback to Congress, CMS and other stakeholders.
To arrange an interview with an ACR spokesperson, please contact Shawn Farley at 703.648.8936 or PR@acr.org.