|
Purpose |
Encourage development and implementation of patient follow-ups in radiology report recommendations. |
|
Tag(s) |
Non-Interpretative |
|
Panel |
Patient Facing subpanel |
|
Define-AI ID |
22110012 |
|
Originator |
Patient Facing Panel |
|
Panel Chair |
Andrea Borondy Kitts |
| Non-Interpretive Panel Chairs |
Alexander J. Towbin, Melissa Davis |
|
Panel Reviewers |
Non-Interpretive Panel |
|
License |
|
|
Status |
Studies using Electronic Health Records to assess if radiology reports and images are accessed by the referring clinician indicate that an estimated 7.5 to 15% of reports and images are not opened by the referring clinician. (1-3) Assuming that an unread radiology report is not contributing to patient care and may result in missed care opportunities, confirming that that radiology report reached the destination and was read by the ordering clinician will improve patient care.
An algorithm to confirm report receipt and viewing will improve patient care and reduce risk to the patient, radiologist, referring clinician, and institutions that employ them. It will lessen the need for alternative communication methods by radiologists resulting in improved efficiency. Additionally, notifying the patient of read receipts by referring clinicians will provide another layer of safety by encouraging patients to follow-up on their results if they are not contacted by the clinician or their staff about the test results.
References:
A 56-year-old female has a CT of the Abdomen/Pelvis performed for left lower quadrant pain. Radiologist reads the study and determines there is no diverticulitis. However, the following additional findings are reported: abdominal aortic aneurysm measuring 3.4 cm, indeterminate adrenal lesion, and left ovarian cyst measuring 3 cm. Radiologist determines that routine delivery of report is sufficient. Report is signed and sent for delivery.
There are several possible options for report delivery. AI queries Radiology Information system (RIS) to determine method of delivery: Since RIS will know how the report was sent, the following methods could be used to determine method of delivery. Responses can be tracked to determine which delivery method was successful.
Reference:
|
Procedure(s) |
N/A |
Radiology Report
|
Definition |
All imaging tests and procedures |
|
Data Type |
Text |
| Modality | All |
| Body Region | All |
| Anatomic Focus | All |
Read Return Receipts
| RadElement ID | N/A |
Time to Referring Physician Report Review
|
RadElement ID |
N/A |
|
Definition |
Time in minutes |
|
Data Type |
Numerical |
|
Value Set |
Continuous |
|
Units |
Minutes |
No known related public datasets at this time, please alert us if you know of any.