The ACR is adapting, advocating for and developing new tools an technology in its efforts to address the workforce crisis.
A host of healthcare topics received due attention at the June 2024 AMA Annual meeting, and a number of the discussions were relevant to radiology. Discussions about the physician workforce shortage, however, were of particular interest. It is clear now that the workforce challenges once on the distant horizon have arrived for many specialties, including radiology. Interestingly, in 1970, Herb Abrams wrote about the “Manpower Shortage in Radiology” due to “the imbalance in the supply-and-demand equation and the inexorable increase in the number of radiological examinations” — and “the growing unwillingness of many physicians to handle medical problems without every possible safeguard and guarantee that nothing has been missed”.
Fast forward a half-century later and here we are again, talking about the radiology workforce shortage. The reasons for the demand-versus-supply mismatch have been detailed in a variety of articles and workforce surveys and include the following:
Addressing this problem will require a multi-prong approach and a willingness by radiologists and their practices to adapt and make sacrifices. A recent article in the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) by Rawson et al. details short-term strategies to try to manage the shortage of radiologists. The tactics are divided into three categories: people, process and physical plant (meaning physical infrastructure). Under the category of “people,” the authors suggest asking part-time employees (who are able to do so) to work one more day a week and/or hiring reading room assistants to optimize radiologists’ workflow. The use of retired radiologists has also been suggested to help with the shortage of radiologists. Hiring non-physician providers for various minor fluoroscopic or ultrasound-guided procedures is also listed as a tactic, with specific recognition that the physician extenders must be under the direct supervision of a radiologist to obviate concerns about scope creep. For academic institutions with ACGME-accredited training programs, employment of internationally trained radiologists as faculty for the last three of their four years of training (as part of the ABR alternative 4-year training pathway) and use of U.S.-trained fellows to work a few weekends per month were also suggestions.
Addressing this problem will require a multi-prong approach and a willingness by radiologists and their practices to adapt and make sacrifices.
For the category of “process,” the authors proposed buying back some vacation time (especially from radiologists who receive 12 or more weeks per year of vacation/professional development time), providing home workstations for all radiologists and allowing them to intermittently internally-moonlight and read from home for a few hours as needed, and contracting with teleradiology groups to provide “final reads” versus “preliminary reports” that must be over-read by a member of the practice.
In terms of “physical plant,” in addition to home workstations, the ergonomics of the workstations (keyboards, lighting, tables with height adjustments, etc.) were emphasized as being important for the physical well-being of radiologists. While AI algorithms and tools hold promise and will eventually help radiologists with process and workflow improvements, report generation and computer-assisted detection of abnormalities, whether AI will significantly benefit radiologists in the near-term in not yet clear. The strategies and tactics provided in the AJR manuscript can be tailored to the unique needs of various groups. However, ensuring that radiologists’ physical and mental well-being are maintained and burnout is averted requires regular monitoring and the recognition of its importance.
While some of these strategies and tactics may be employed for the short-term, the College will also continue to be vigilant in pushing for a legislative fix to provide longer-term solutions. This encompasses increasing the number of physicians who are able to practice in the U.S. These efforts will include partnering with an ACR-led coalition of healthcare associations to advocate for:
Additionally, the College will continue to advocate for and invest in the Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) Section of the 2014 Protecting Access to Medicare Act (PAMA) as a utilization management and clinical decision support (CDS) ordering tool for advanced imaging studies for inpatients, ED patients and outpatients to reduce inappropriate use — thereby reducing the workload for radiologists. Of note, use of this CDS tool based on the AUC is estimated to save CMS $2 billion over a 10-year period.
Addressing the shortage of radiologists will be challenging for the foreseeable future. However, as per the Stockdale paradox, we should remain both hopeful and realistic as radiology and radiologists will adapt, advocate and develop new tools and technology in our efforts to address this workforce conundrum sooner rather than later. That’s what we have done in the past and will continue to do going forward.
For more on the radiology workforce landscape, follow recent ACR Bulletin articles on mitigating the impact of staff shortages and rising study volumes.
No One Thing
Easing the workforce burden may begin with listening, acknowledging trends and finding overlooked solutions.
Read more
The Power of PIER Support
ACR’s Pipeline Initiative for the Enrichment of Radiology program exposes a broad range of talented medical students to imaging specialties.
Read more
Culture Chasm
All physicians must come together and embrace the clinical and mission-driven roots from which we grew and do the right thing.
Read more
