Jared Christensen, MD, MBA
Richard Duszak Jr., MD, FACR
Andrew Moriarity, MD, MBA
Jared Christensen, MD, MBA, Professor and Vice Chair, Radiology at Duke University Medical Center; Andrew Moriarity, MD, MBA, Executive Vice President of Advanced Radiology Services, PC, and Associate Professor at the Michigan State University College of Human Medicine; and Richard Duszak Jr., MD, FACR, Chair and Professor of Radiology at the University of Mississippi Medical Center, contributed this piece.
Consolidation is rapidly reshaping the radiology landscape, bringing new partnerships, larger practice structures and shifting definitions of autonomy and leadership. For some, it’s a path toward greater stability and shared resources; for others, it raises concerns about independence and identity within an evolving health care system.
To capture a range of perspectives, we invited three radiologists from different practice settings to share how consolidation impacts their work and the profession as a whole. Here’s what they said
Dr. Moriarity: Consolidation in radiology reflects broader forces across healthcare — declining reimbursement, workforce shortages, and the escalating costs of technology, compliance, and capital investment. Hospitals and private groups alike are seeking stability and leverage to navigate these pressures while maintaining quality and access.
Dr. Moriarity: When done well, consolidation can enable subspecialized coverage, shared quality infrastructure, and the ability to invest in technology that smaller groups could not accomplish alone. It can enhance reliability, resilience, and patient access across large networks. But consolidation done poorly erodes culture—creating distance between physicians and patients, reducing autonomy, and undermining the sense of shared ownership that sustains excellence in radiology.
Dr. Duszak: The term “consolidation” is often used interchangeably with private-equity driven corporatization but that isn’t always the case. Many independent practices, not-for-profit health systems, and academic health systems are increasingly merging and acquiring so it’s a trend all across healthcare.
Dr. Christensen: I have experienced consolidation in a way that few anticipated would reach academic medicine. Until 2022, Duke radiologists belonged to a large independent physician group contracting with the university health system. We are now health system employees. Through the transition, several benefits of integration have materialized, but some have not yet been realized, and we have lost a degree of autonomy under a centralized administrative structure. It remains a work in progress that requires consistent physician engagement to strengthen our ties to the broader health system and to define our evolving role within it.
One key lesson from my experience is that consolidation is everyone’s concern, affecting private and academic practices alike. This underscores why conversations about consolidation and other practice trends, such as those at the ACR-RBMA Practice Leadership Forum, are so critical for our specialty.
Dr. Duszak: Over my career, I’ve seen radiology groups get bigger and bigger, making it harder for radiologists to feel personally engaged in their practices. Many of our old work families have morphed into impersonal corporate entities and have left many feeling like they have no autonomy and agency. The American College of Radiology® (ACR®) recently launched a task force, co-led by me and Dr. Eric Rubin, on how we can best support radiologists in the increasingly consolidated environments in which we practice. The ACR Radiology Leadership Institute® (RLI) will be a big part of that, offering leadership training and networking to help radiologists navigate bigger systems and maintain influence. It will be a focus of a number of upcoming meetings and sessions. We will be highlighting different practice models, stories of what works (and likely what doesn’t work), and challenge both staff and volunteer leaders at the ACR to think about our consolidating marketplace in all the ACR does and offers.
Dr. Christensen: Be an active participant in defining your future, not a passive recipient of change.
Approach consolidation as a negotiation about values, not just compensation. Before signing anything, ask yourself and your potential partners critical questions: What happens to clinical autonomy? How are quality standards maintained? What voice do physicians have in operational decisions? What is the plan for preserving culture and mission?
It is important to remember that concerns arise from consolidation gone wrong, not consolidation itself. The difference lies in whether radiologists maintain meaningful influence.
As consolidation continues to evolve, radiology leaders are finding new ways to adapt, advocate and strengthen their practices. The conversation is far from over, and it’s one that will be explored in greater depth at the 2026 ACR–RBMA Practice Leadership Forum, where experts will dive deeper into the challenges, opportunities and real-world strategies for navigating radiology’s changing practice environment. Join us Jan. 30 to Feb. 1 to learn practical insights and strategies for leading through change.
Advocacy to Access: Missouriās Breast Screening Success
Radiology advocacy plays a key role in improving patient care, according to a new Neiman HPI study published in JACR.
Read more
#FocusedForwardTogether
Discussion of upcoming advocacy efforts taking place during the ACR 2025 annual meeting and how members can participate.
Read more
Lessons from Hurricane Helene and Beyond
Radiology as a profession has weathered countless storms in recent memory. The many unprecedented challenges of the COVID-19 years; seemingly endless CMS cuts and declining reimbursement in the face of soaring imaging volumes and workforce shortages; dangerous scope of practice expansion by unqualified individuals, and the increasingly prevalent corporate practice of medicine.
Read more
