ACR Appropriateness Criteria®
The ACR Appropriateness Criteria® are evidence-based guidelines to assist referring physicians and other providers in making the most appropriate imaging or treatment decision for a specific clinical condition. By employing these guidelines, providers enhance quality of care and contribute to the most efficacious use of radiology.
The guidelines are developed by expert panels in diagnostic imaging, interventional radiology, and radiation oncology. Each panel includes leaders in radiology and other specialties. There are 175 topics with over 850 variants in the December 2011 version.
The ACR allows individuals to use the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® for research, scientific, and / or informational purposes only. If you wish to use the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® for other reasons, please contact the ACR at acr_ac@acr.org or 703-648-8900 for permission and licensing information. Click here for terms and conditions.
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Search Engine
This search engine allows you to search for clinical conditions found within the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® documents.
Click here to use our ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Search Engine
Anytime, Anywhere™ Application for Mobile Devices
In collaboration with Skyscape, the ACR has developed the Anytime, Anywhere™ application for handheld mobile devices as an alternative solution to radiology benefit management companies or computerized physician order entry systems that do not contain the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® guidance. This application provides instant, point-of-care access to all of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria®, which can be directly downloaded to the iPhone, Blackberry, Palm, or other PDAs, smart phones or mobile devices. The content includes topics from expert panels in breast, cardiac, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, neurologic, thoracic, urologic, pediatric, vascular, and women’s imaging, as well as interventional radiology and radiation oncology.
Diagnostic Imaging Topics
Topics with an asterisks (*) include pediatric imaging recommendations.
Breast Imaging
Cardiac Imaging
Acute Chest Pain — Suspected Aortic Dissection (Revised)
Acute Chest Pain — Suspected Pulmonary Embolism (Revised)
Acute Nonspecfic Chest Pain — Low Probability of Coronary Artery Disease (Revised)
Chest Pain Suggestive of Acute Coronary Syndrome
Chronic Chest Pain — High Probability of Coronary Artery Disease
Chronic Chest Pain — Low to Intermediate Probability of Coronary Artery Disease
Dyspnea — Suspected Cardiac Origin
Gastrointestinal Imaging
Acute Abdominal Pain and Fever or Suspected Abdominal Abscess
Crohn Disease* (Revised)
Left Lower Quadrant Pain — Suspected Diverticulitis (Revised)
Liver Lesion — Initial Characterization
Pretreatment Staging of Colorectal Cancer (Revised)
Right Lower Quadrant Pain — Suspected Appendicitis*
Suspected Small Bowel Obstruction
*This topic also includes pediatric imaging recommendations
Musculoskeletal Imaging
Avascular Necrosis (Osteonecrosis) of the Hip
Chronic Elbow Pain (Revised)
Chronic Hip Pain (Revised)
Follow-up of Malignant or Aggressive Musculoskeletal Tumors
Imaging after Total Knee Arthroplasty
Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Density*
Stress (Fatigue/Insufficiency) Fracture, Including Sacrum, Excluding Other Vertebrae
Suspected Osteomyelitis of the Foot in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus
*This topic also includes pediatric imaging recommendations
Neurologic Imaging
Dementia and Movement Disorders
Low Back Pain (Revised)
Myelopathy (Revised)
Orbits, Vision and Visual Loss*
*This topic also includes pediatric imaging recommendations
Pediatric Imaging
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip — Child
Fever Without Source — Child (Revised)
Limping Child — Ages 0-5 Years
Suspected Physical Abuse — Child
Urinary Tract Infection — Child
Vomiting in Infants up to 3 Months of Age
Additional topics that include pediatric imaging recommendations
Orbits, Vision and Visual Loss*
Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Density
Thoracic Imaging
Acute Respiratory Illness Illness in Immunocompetent Patients
Acute Respiratory Illness in Immunocompromised Patients (Revised)
Chronic Dyspnea — Suspected Pulmonary Origin
Non-Invasive Clinical Staging of Bronchogenic Carcinoma
Rib Fractures (Revised)
Routine Admission and Preoperative Chest Radiography (Revised)
Routine Chest Radiograph in ICU Patients (Revised)
Routine Chest Radiographs in Uncomplicated Hypertension (Revised)
Urologic Imaging
Acute Onset Flank Pain — Suspicion of Stone Disease
Acute Onset of Scrotal Pain — without Trauma, without Antecedent Mass
Follow-up Imaging of Bladder Carcinoma
Follow-up of Renal Cell Carcinoma
Incidentally Discovered Adrenal Mass
Obstructive Voiding Symptoms Secondary to Prostate Disease
Post-treatment Follow-up of Prostate Cancer
Pretreatment Staging of Invasive Bladder Cancer
Pretreatment Staging Prostate Cancer
Recurrent Lower Urinary Tract Infections in Women
Renal Cell Carcinoma Staging (Revised)
Vascular Imaging
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Interventional Planning and Follow-up
Blunt Chest Trauma — Suspected Aortic Injury (Revised)
Claudication — Suspected Vascular Etiology
Follow-up of Lower Extremity Arterial Bypass Surgery
Pulsatile Abdominal Mass, Suspected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Radiologic Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Recurrent Symptoms Following Lower Extremity Angioplasty
Sudden Onset of Cold, Painful Leg
Women's Imaging
Acute Pelvic Pain in the Reproductive Age Group
Assessment of Gravid Cervix (Revised)
Clinically Suspected Adnexal Mass
Growth Disturbances—Risk of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Multiple Gestations (Revised)
Pretreatment Evaluation and Follow-up of Endometrial Cancer of the Uterus
Pretreatment Planning of Invasive Cancer of the Cervix (Revised)
Interventional Radiology Topics
Interventional Radiology
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Interventional Planning and Follow-up
Radiologic Management of Benign and Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Radiologic Management of Hepatic Malignancy (Revised)
Radiologic Management of Iliac Artery Occlusive Disease
Radiologic Management of Infected Fluid Collections (Revised)
Radiologic Management of Inferior Vena Cava Filters
Radiologic Management of Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding (Revised)
Radiologic Management of Lower Extremity Venous Insusfficiency
Radiologic Management of Mesenteric Ischemia
Radiologic Management of Thoracic Nodules and Masses
Radiologic Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Radiologic Management of Urinary Tract Obstruction
Radiation Oncology Topics
Bone Metastases
Non-Spine Bone Metastases (Revised)
Brain Metastases
Breast
Gynecology
Head and Neck
Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
Ipsilateral Radiation for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tonsil (New)
Local-Regional Therapy for Resectable Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinomas
Retreatment of Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer after Prior Definitive Radiation
Lung
Induction and Adjuvant Therapy for N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Non-Invasive Clinical Staging of Bronchogenic Carcinoma
Nonsurgical Treatment for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Good Performance Status/Definitive Intent
Nonsurgical Treatment for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Poor Performance Status or Palliative Intent
Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Lymphoma
Prostate
Definitive External Beam Irradiation in Stage T1 and T2 Prostate Cancer
External Beam Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer (Revised)
Locally Advanced (High Risk) Prostate Cancer
Permanent Source Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer
Rectal/Anal
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Supporting Documentation
The documents listed below explain the process and methods used in developing and revising the ACR AC topics.
Background
During the 1990s, the ACR recognized the need to define national guidelines for appropriate use of imaging technologies. These guidelines became known as the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® (ACR AC). In 1993, the ACR AC were formally introduced by K.K. Wallace, MD (former chair of ACR Board of Chancellors) during testimony to the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee. Dr. Wallace stated that the ACR was ready to create guidelines for radiology to eliminate inappropriate utilization of radiologic services1, 2. Read More
The ACR Task Force on Appropriateness Criteria was created and panel chairs were appointed in late 1993. In 1994, deliberations had begun to develop nationally accepted, scientifically-based guidelines to assist referring physicians in making appropriate imaging decisions for given patient clinical conditions in order to provide the College’s perspective on how to best use limited health care resources.
In creating the ACR AC, the Task Force incorporated attributes for developing acceptable medical practice guidelines used by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) as designed by the Institute of Medicine. From the beginning, the methodology relied on a combination of evidence and when the data from scientific outcome and technology assessment studies are insufficient, expert consensus. Additionally, the methodology employs the input of physicians from other medical specialties to provide important clinical perspectives.
The AHRQ is explicit in stating its intent that scientific evidence should be used as much as possible but that judgment and group consensus will be necessary in the development of medical guidelines. The National Guidelines Clearinghouse (NGC), one of the initiatives of AHRQ, is a public resource for evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. The ACR AC topics are posted on the NGC site.
Currently, the ACR AC are the most comprehensive evidence based guidelines for diagnostic imaging selection, radiotherapy protocols, and image guided interventional procedures. They embody the best, current evidence for selecting appropriate diagnostic imaging and interventional procedures for numerous clinical conditions.
1 Cascade PN. Setting appropriateness guidelines for Radiology. Radiology 1994; 192(1):50A-54A.
2 Cascade PN. The American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria project. Radiology 2000; 214 Suppl:3-46.
Overview
A general explanation of the key program elements and components, such as guiding principles, description of the expert panels, and process for criteria development and review.
Composition of Expert Panels
A description of the expert panels that develop the ACR AC topics.
Organizational Chart of AC Committees
A graphic to illustrate the organization of the ACR AC committees.
Medical Specialty Organization Representation
A list of Medical Specialty Society that collaborate on the ACR AC topics.
Topic Review Process
Appropriateness Rating Information
Literature Search Process
An explanation of how literature searches are performed when a topic is developed or revised.
Evidence Table Development
An explanation of how the evidence is assessed and presented in Evidence Tables for the ACR AC topics.
Relative Radiation Level Information
An explanation of how the ACR AC assesses patient radiation exposure for various diagnostic procedures using "relative radiation levels".
Procedure Information
A definition of terms for contrast usage in the ACR AC procedures.
Patient Age Definitions
A definition of terms used to describe patient age information in the ACR AC topics.
Citation Information
A presentation of the proper citation for the ACR AC topics.
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Citation Information
The American College of Radiology suggests the following format when citing the ACR Appropriateness Criteria®:
American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: <title>. Available at: <URL>. Accessed <DATE>.
American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: acute chest pain — suspected aortic dissection. Available at: http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/app_criteria/pdf/ExpertPanelonCardiovascularImaging/
AcuteChestPainSuspectedAorticDissectionDoc2.aspx. Accessed 12 December 2011.
Terms and Conditions
A document that contains the copyright notice, the disclaimer, warranty information and the use agreement statement for the ACR AC.
Copyright Notice
The American College of Radiology is the copyright owner with respect to a work entitled American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria® (hereinafter referred to as the “ACR Appropriateness Criteria®”), which contains clinical practice guidelines for appropriateness criteria developed using a modified Delphi technique to arrive at a consensus and intended to guide radiologists, radiation oncologists, referring physicians, and patients in making initial decisions about diagnostic imaging and therapeutic techniques.
All the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® material on this server is protected by U.S. and international copyrights. Personal use of material is permitted for research, scientific and/or information purposes only. You may not modify or create derivative works based on American College of Radiology material. No part of any material posted on the American College of Radiology Web site may be copied, downloaded, stored in a retrieval system, or redistributed for any other purpose without the expressed written permission of American College of Radiology.
Requests for permission to use copyrighted material may be e-mailed to the American College of Radiology at acr_ac@acr.org.
Disclaimer
The ACR Committee on Appropriateness Criteria and its expert panels have developed criteria for determining appropriate imaging examinations for diagnosis and treatment of specified medical condition(s). These criteria are intended to guide radiologists, radiation oncologists and referring physicians in making decisions regarding radiologic imaging and treatment. Generally, the complexity and severity of a patient’s clinical condition should dictate the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Only those examinations generally used for evaluation of the patient’s condition are ranked. Other imaging studies necessary to evaluate other co-existent diseases or other medical consequences of this condition are not considered in this document. The availability of equipment or personnel may influence the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Imaging techniques classified as investigational by the FDA have not been considered in developing these criteria; however, study of new equipment and applications should be encouraged. The ultimate decision regarding the appropriateness of any specific radiologic examination or treatment must be made by the referring physician and radiologist in light of all the circumstances presented in an individual examination.
The American College of Radiology seeks and encourages collaboration with other organizations on the development of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria through society representation on expert panels. Participation by representatives from collaborating societies on the expert panel does not necessarily imply society endorsement of the final document.
Warranty
Warranty limitations:
- ACR Appropriateness Criteria® is provided on an “as is” basis, without warranties of any kind, either express or implied, including, but not limited to, warranties of title, or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose;
- the use of ACR Appropriateness Criteria® is at your own risk;
- access to ACR Appropriateness Criteria® may be interrupted and may not be error-free;
- neither the American College of Radiology or anyone else involved in creating, producing, or delivering ACR Appropriateness Criteria® contained therein, shall be liable for any direct or indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive damages arising out of your use or inability to use ACR Appropriateness Criteria®.
Agreement
By accessing and/or downloading this file, you expressly agree and consent to the foregoing terms and conditions.