American College of Radiology
Capitol Hill Day
Exams & Assessments
Radiology Leadership Institute
Quality & Safety
Centers of Excellence
Lung Cancer Screening
Radiology Data Registries
Advocacy in Action eNews
State & Local Relations
Radiology Advocacy Network
Economics & Health Policy
Awards & Honors
Commissions & Committees
Resident & Fellow
Health Policy Institute
News & Publications
Tools You Can Use
ACR Live Meetings
Meeting & Course Calendar
Where ACR Exhibits
Imaging Cuts Potentially Dangerous, Unfounded and Unnecessary
ACR Strategic Plan and Core Purpose
ACR Social Media
Jobs at ACR
CMS Releases Medicare Fee Schedule: ACR Says Imaging Cuts are Dangerous, Unfounded and Unnecessary
November 02, 2012
Cuts to funding for medical imaging exams in the Medicare Fee Schedule Rule — particularly expansion of the multiple procedure payment reduction for interpretation of scans performed on the same patient, in the same session on the same day, to all providers in the same practice or hospital — are unnecessary, unfounded and undermine care for the most sick or injured.
“These cuts primarily affect care for people with immediately life threatening illnesses or injuries — those suffering from multiple trauma or heart attacks, stroke patients and people fighting cancer — all of whom often need multiple imaging exams to survive. Interpretation of these scans many times requires expertise of different physicians. These cuts discourage doctors from working as a team, which is the direction that health care is supposed to be going, and pull the rug out from under physicians working to save these people’s lives,” said Paul Ellenbogen, MD, FACR, chair of the American College of Radiology Board of Chancellors.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) expanded not only the number of physicians affected by this policy, but the
number of exams
, based on a theory that has been medically debunked. No publicly available evidence supports a 25 percent reduction to physician interpretation payments. A
proves that any efficiencies in the multiple procedure setting are highly variable and, at most, total one-fifth of what CMS contends. No efficiencies in care support a funding cut when different physicians in a group practice interpret separate imaging scans for the same patient.
“This final rule expands a terrible policy that many lawmakers already oppose. More than 250 members of the House and 17 senators are co-sponsors of the Diagnostic Imaging Services Access Protection Act (
) which would block the original multiple procedure payment reduction on which these are based. The ACR calls on lawmakers to protect care for the most vulnerable of our nation’s seniors by passing H.R. 3269,” said Dr. Ellenbogen.
Medicare has already cut funding for imaging scans by roughly $6 billion since 2006 forcing many radiology providers to cut back services to stay in practice or close altogether. According to the FDA, there are now
200 fewer mammography facilities
and nearly 1,200 fewer mammography scanners available to American women
than in 2007
, shortly after the first of several imaging cuts went into effect. A
December 2011 study
in Health Affairs found that as many as 12,000 American seniors may have suffered broken bones due to Medicare cuts in reimbursement for just one type of imaging scan used to gauge bone density in older Americans (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry — “DEXA”).
Further cuts will only further restrict access to imaging care, place more patients at risk, and do little, if anything to bend the Medicare cost curve. A recent
Neiman Institute Report
study in JACR
Moran Company report
show imaging use and imaging costs are down significantly. In fact, Medicare spends the same amount on imaging now as in 2003. Imaging is also the slowest growing of all physician services among privately insured Americans according to the
Health Care Cost Institute.
“Since studies show that imaging exams can reduce
unnecessary hospital admissions
shorten length of stay
, and access to imaging is directly
linked to greater life expectancy
, we need quality based medical imaging policy – not blind cuts. This includes mandatory
of all imaging providers, greater use of
ACR Appropriateness Criteria
-based order entry systems which educate providers as to which test is best for that patient’s symptoms, and federally backed efforts to incentivize and encourage integration of imaging scans into electronic health records. Short sighted imaging cuts ‘artificially’ limit care and will do more harm than good,” said Dr. Ellenbogen.
ACR will comment on other provisions in the Medicare Final rule in the coming days.
To arrange an interview with an ACR spokesperson, contact Shawn Farley at 703-648-8936 or